(This is eldena from livejournal, I came here from there and I never use this DW account but I shockingly have one and have no reason to log out so hey.)
I'm blown away by how the chart would be fine as an examination of how stereotypes interact if not for that amazingly ridiculous Strong Female Character branch. Did the fact that the "clichéd" section is a gazillion times more complex not strike anyone as a problem? If anything, it does a good job making stereotypes sound a lot more interesting than strong female characters.
Though I find I'm having trouble playing the game since the first two questions alone are very subjective and the next two also tend to be widely debatable; I suspect I give characters more passes than some people.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2010-10-13 06:55 pm (UTC)I'm blown away by how the chart would be fine as an examination of how stereotypes interact if not for that amazingly ridiculous Strong Female Character branch. Did the fact that the "clichéd" section is a gazillion times more complex not strike anyone as a problem? If anything, it does a good job making stereotypes sound a lot more interesting than strong female characters.
Though I find I'm having trouble playing the game since the first two questions alone are very subjective and the next two also tend to be widely debatable; I suspect I give characters more passes than some people.